Electric Field Lines — Question 6

Section 22-2 · Physics pages 3502–3503

Question 6 A closed oriented field line is incompatible with electrostatic work conservation A proposed electrostatic field line forms a smooth closed loop of length ℓ, and the field is nonzero everywhere on it. Its arrows follow the loop traversal. Use the electrostatic property H E · dl = 0. candidate Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Use the field-line tangent condition to test the proposal. (b) For the special candidate of constant tangent field magnitude E0 on a circle of radius R, calculate the loop integral and work on a charge q externally guided once around it.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 6 - Solution A closed oriented field line is incompatible with electrostatic work conservation candidate (a) Method and calculation dl = ˆt ds, E = |E|ˆt. I E · dl = I |E| ds > 0, contradicting electrostatics. (b) Interpretation and further calculation I E · dl = 2πRE0, W = q I E · dl = 2πRqE0. E0 > 0, R > 0 ⇒2πRE0̸ = 0. Such a circulation may belong to a non-electrostatic induced field, but it cannot describe the assumed static-charge field. Physical check The no-closed-line result here explicitly uses the electrostatic circulation condition.

Question 6

A closed oriented field line is incompatible with electrostatic work conservation

A proposed electrostatic field line forms a smooth closed loop of length ℓ\ell, and the field is nonzero everywhere on it. Its arrows follow the loop traversal. Use the electrostatic property ∮𝑬⋅d𝒍=0\oint\mathbf E\cdot d\mathbf l=0.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Use the field-line tangent condition to test the proposal.

  2. For the special candidate of constant tangent field magnitude E0E_0 on a circle of radius R, calculate the loop integral and work on a charge q externally guided once around it.

Question 6 - Solution

A closed oriented field line is incompatible with electrostatic work conservation

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

d𝒍=𝒕̂ds,𝑬=|𝑬|𝒕̂.d\mathbf l=\hat{\mathbf t}\,ds,\quad\mathbf E=|\mathbf E|\hat{\mathbf t}.∮𝑬⋅d𝒍=∮|𝑬|ds>0,contradicting electrostatics.\oint\mathbf E\cdot d\mathbf l=\oint|\mathbf E|\,ds>0,\quad\text{contradicting electrostatics}.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

∮𝑬⋅d𝒍=2πRE0,W=q∮𝑬⋅d𝒍=2πRqE0.\oint\mathbf E\cdot d\mathbf l=2\pi R E_0,\quad W=q\oint\mathbf E\cdot d\mathbf l=2\pi RqE_0.E0>0,R>0⇒2πRE0≠0.E_0>0,R>0\Rightarrow2\pi R E_0\ne0.Such a circulation may belong to a non-electrostatic induced field, but it cannot describe the assumed static-charge field.

Physical check

The no-closed-line result here explicitly uses the electrostatic circulation condition.