A Statistical View of Entropy — Question 1

Section 20-7 · Physics pages 3352–3353

Question 1 Counting arrangements distinguishes a macrostate from a microstate Six distinguishable, independent particles occupy two equal halves of a box. Each particle is equally likely to be in either half. A microstate specifies every particle location; a macrostate specifies only the number n on the left. Use S = kB ln Ωfor a macrostate of multiplicity Ω. left right Schematic; labels, not drawing lengths, specify the data. (a) Derive the multiplicity and probability of n = 3, and compare with n = 6. (b) Find the entropy difference between these macrostates. Explain why a particular balanced microstate is no more probable than a particular all-left microstate.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 1 - Solution Counting arrangements distinguishes a macrostate from a microstate left right (a) Method and calculation Ω(n) = ( 6 n ) = 6! n!(6 −n)!, Ωtotal = 26 = 64. Ω(3) = 20, P(3) = 20/64 = .3125, Ω(6) = 1, P(6) = 1/64. (b) Interpretation and further calculation S(3) −S(6) = kB ln 20 ≈2.99573kB. P(specified microstate) = 2−6. The larger macrostate probability comes from the number of compatible arrangements, not a larger probability for each arrangement. Physical check The pictured balanced arrangement is one of twenty; it does not represent all twenty at once.

Question 1

Counting arrangements distinguishes a macrostate from a microstate

Six distinguishable, independent particles occupy two equal halves of a box. Each particle is equally likely to be in either half. A microstate specifies every particle location; a macrostate specifies only the number nn on the left. Use S=kBln⁡ΩS=k_B\ln\Omega for a macrostate of multiplicity Ω\Omega.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Derive the multiplicity and probability of n=3n=3, and compare with n=6n=6.

  2. Find the entropy difference between these macrostates. Explain why a particular balanced microstate is no more probable than a particular all-left microstate.

Question 1 - Solution

Counting arrangements distinguishes a macrostate from a microstate

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Ω(n)=(6n)=6!n!(6−n)!,Ωtotal=26=64.\Omega(n)=\binom6n=\frac{6!}{n!(6-n)!},\quad\Omega_{\mathrm{total}}=2^6=64.Ω(3)=20,P(3)=20/64=.3125,Ω(6)=1,P(6)=1/64.\Omega(3)=20,\quad P(3)=20/64=.3125,\quad\Omega(6)=1,\quad P(6)=1/64.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

S(3)−S(6)=kBln⁡20≈2.99573kB.S(3)-S(6)=k_B\ln20\approx2.99573k_B.P(specified microstate)=2−6.P(\text{specified microstate})=2^{-6}.The larger macrostate probability comes from the number of compatible arrangements, not a larger probability for each arrangement.

Physical check

The pictured balanced arrangement is one of twenty; it does not represent all twenty at once.