Show solutionHide solution
Question 9
Midpoint velocity and midpoint position obey different identities
For a constant-acceleration trajectory on , derive results from A particular trajectory has , , and .
Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.
Integrate the linear velocity to prove exactly. Does this imply ?
Derive the difference between the endpoint-position mean and the actual middle-time position. Use the measured difference to infer and then .
Determine the middle-time velocity and compare it with the full-interval average. Explain why averaging endpoint positions and averaging endpoint velocities behave differently here.
Would either midpoint identity be guaranteed for an arbitrary smooth, variable-acceleration trajectory? Identify the specific polynomial structure used in the derivations.
Question 9 - Solution
Midpoint velocity and midpoint position obey different identities
Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.
(a) The integral mean of an affine velocity equals its middle value.
This is a velocity identity; it does not assert that the middle-time position is the mean of the endpoint positions.
(b) Subtract the two position expressions.
The endpoint mean is , while the middle-time position is . Thus The measured difference is . Hence . Using then gives .
(c) Check the velocity mean without substituting a position mean.
At 2 s, , equal to . The velocity function is affine in time, while the position function contains a quadratic term. That term causes the actual middle position, 8 m, to differ from the endpoint-position mean, 10 m.
(d) State the scope of the identities.
The results follow from linear velocity and quadratic position under one constant acceleration. Arbitrary smooth variable-acceleration histories need not have either property, so neither identity is guaranteed in that broader class. Agreement for a special nonconstant history could occur accidentally and would not prove constant acceleration.