Another Look at Constant Acceleration — Question 9

Section 2-7 · Physics pages 268–269

Question 9 Midpoint velocity and midpoint position obey different identities For a constant-acceleration trajectory on 0 ≤t ≤T, derive results from v(t) = v0 + at, x(t) = x0 + v0t + 1 2at2. A particular trajectory has T = 4 s, x(0) = 2 m, x(2 s) = 8 m and x(4 s) = 18 m. t (s) x (m) 2 4 2 8 10 18 Solid: the constant-acceleration position history. Dashed: endpoint chord. The open point is the chord’s middle value, not the actual position at that time. (a) Integrate the linear velocity to prove ¯v = v(T/2) exactly. Does this imply x(T/2) = [x(0) + x(T)]/2? (b) Derive the difference between the endpoint-position mean and the actual middle-time position. Use the measured difference to infer a and then v0. (c) Determine the middle-time velocity and compare it with the full-interval average. Explain why averaging endpoint positions and averaging endpoint velocities behave differently here. (d) Would either midpoint identity be guaranteed for an arbitrary smooth, variable-acceleration trajectory? Identify the specific polynomial structure used in the derivations.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 9 - Solution Midpoint velocity and midpoint position obey different identities t (s) x (m) 2 4 2 8 10 18 (a) The integral mean of an affine velocity equals its middle value. ¯v = 1 T ∫T 0 (v0 + at) dt = v0 + 1 2aT = v(T/2) . This is a velocity identity; it does not assert that the middle-time position is the mean of the endpoint positions. (b) Subtract the two position expressions. The endpoint mean is x0 + v0T/2 + aT 2/4, while the middle-time position is x0 + v0T/2 + aT 2/8. Thus x(0) + x(T) 2 −x(T/2) = aT 2 8 . The measured difference is (2 + 18)/2 −8 = 2 m. Hence a = 1 m/s2 . Using 18 −2 = 4v0 + 1 2(1)(4)2 then gives v0 = 2 m/s . (c) Check the velocity mean without substituting a position mean. x(t) = 2 + 2t + 1 2t2, v(t) = 2 + t; x(2) = 8̸ = 10 = x(0) + x(4) 2 (SI). At 2 s, v = 2 + 1(2) = 4 m/s , equal to (18 −2)/4 = 4 m/s. The velocity function is affine in time, while the position function contains a quadratic term. That term causes the actual middle position, 8 m, to differ from the endpoint-position mean, 10 m. (d) State the scope of the identities. The results follow from linear velocity and quadratic position under one constant acceleration. Arbitrary smooth variable-acceleration histories need not have either property, so neither identity is guaranteed in that broader class. Agreement for a special nonconstant history could occur accidentally and would not prove constant acceleration.

Question 9

Midpoint velocity and midpoint position obey different identities

For a constant-acceleration trajectory on 0≤t≤T0\leq t\leq T, derive results from v(t)=v0+at,x(t)=x0+v0t+12at2.v(t)=v_0+at,\qquad x(t)=x_0+v_0t+\tfrac12at^2. A particular trajectory has T=4sT=4\ \mathrm{s}, x(0)=2mx(0)=2\ \mathrm{m}, x(2s)=8mx(2\ \mathrm{s})=8\ \mathrm{m} and x(4s)=18mx(4\ \mathrm{s})=18\ \mathrm{m}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Integrate the linear velocity to prove v‾=v(T/2)\bar v=v(T/2) exactly. Does this imply x(T/2)=[x(0)+x(T)]/2x(T/2)=[x(0)+x(T)]/2?

  2. Derive the difference between the endpoint-position mean and the actual middle-time position. Use the measured difference to infer aa and then v0v_0.

  3. Determine the middle-time velocity and compare it with the full-interval average. Explain why averaging endpoint positions and averaging endpoint velocities behave differently here.

  4. Would either midpoint identity be guaranteed for an arbitrary smooth, variable-acceleration trajectory? Identify the specific polynomial structure used in the derivations.

Question 9 - Solution

Midpoint velocity and midpoint position obey different identities

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) The integral mean of an affine velocity equals its middle value.

v‾=1T∫0T(v0+at)dt=v0+12aT=v(T/2).\bar v=\frac1T\int_0^T(v_0+at)\,dt=v_0+\tfrac12aT=\boxed{v(T/2)}. This is a velocity identity; it does not assert that the middle-time position is the mean of the endpoint positions.

(b) Subtract the two position expressions.

The endpoint mean is x0+v0T/2+aT2/4x_0+v_0T/2+aT^2/4, while the middle-time position is x0+v0T/2+aT2/8x_0+v_0T/2+aT^2/8. Thus x(0)+x(T)2−x(T/2)=aT28.\boxed{\frac{x(0)+x(T)}2-x(T/2)=\frac{aT^2}{8}}. The measured difference is (2+18)/2−8=2m(2+18)/2-8=2\ \mathrm{m}. Hence a=1m/s2\boxed{a=1\ \mathrm{m/s^2}}. Using 18−2=4v0+12(1)(4)218-2=4v_0+\tfrac12(1)(4)^2 then gives v0=2m/s\boxed{v_0=2\ \mathrm{m/s}}.

(c) Check the velocity mean without substituting a position mean.

x(t)=2+2t+12t2,v(t)=2+t;x(2)=8≠10=x(0)+x(4)2(SI).x(t)=2+2t+\tfrac12t^2,\quad v(t)=2+t;\qquad x(2)=8\ne10=\frac{x(0)+x(4)}2\quad\text{(SI)}.

At 2 s, v=2+1(2)=4m/sv=2+1(2)=\boxed{4\ \mathrm{m/s}}, equal to (18−2)/4=4m/s(18-2)/4=4\ \mathrm{m/s}. The velocity function is affine in time, while the position function contains a quadratic term. That term causes the actual middle position, 8 m, to differ from the endpoint-position mean, 10 m.

(d) State the scope of the identities.

The results follow from linear velocity and quadratic position under one constant acceleration. Arbitrary smooth variable-acceleration histories need not have either property, so neither identity is guaranteed in that broader class. Agreement for a special nonconstant history could occur accidentally and would not prove constant acceleration.