Instantaneous Velocity and Speed — Question 5

Section 2-4 · Physics pages 200–201

Question 5 A symmetric quotient can hide an undefined velocity A mathematical motion model is x(t) = (3 m/s) |t −2 s|, 0 ≤t ≤4 s. Use the two-sided derivative definition for velocity at an interior time. In this problem, instantaneous speed is defined as s(t) = |v(t)| only where that velocity exists. t (s) x (m) 1 2 3 4 3 6 An exact idealized V-shaped position history. Its sharp corner is part of the model, not a smoothed turnaround. (a) Find velocity and speed for t < 2 s and t > 2 s within the stated interval. (b) At 2 s, evaluate the quotient [x(2 s + h) −x(2 s)]/h for positive and negative h. Does a single instantaneous velocity exist at the corner? (c) For h > 0, compute the symmetric quotient [x(2 s + h) −x(2 s −h)]/(2h). Explain why its value does not establish zero velocity at 2 s. (d) The speed just before and just after the corner tends to 3 m/s. Under the stated definition, is speed at the corner therefore automatically defined as 3 m/s? Distinguish a limiting or assigned value from a value furnished by |v(2 s)|.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 5 - Solution A symmetric quotient can hide an undefined velocity t (s) x (m) 1 2 3 4 3 6 (a) Differentiate each straight branch away from the corner. v(t) = { −3 m/s, t < 2 s, +3 m/s, t > 2 s, s(t) = 3 m/s (t̸ = 2 s). For t < 2 s, position decreases by 3 m each second, so v = −3 m/s . For t > 2 s, it increases at the same rate, so v = +3 m/s . On both open branches s = 3 m/s . (b) The two one-sided quotients disagree. lim h→0− 3|h| h = −3̸ = +3 = lim h→0+ 3|h| h (m/s). At 2 s the position is zero. The quotient is (3 m/s)|h|/h, equal to +3 m/s for positive h and −3 m/s for negative h. The two-sided limit does not exist. Thus v(2 s) is undefined in this model . (c) Symmetric cancellation is not the derivative test. x(2 + h) −x(2 −h) 2h = 3h −3h 2h = 0 (h > 0). The two symmetric positions are equal, so the centered quotient is zero for every allowed h > 0. This describes zero average velocity between those paired endpoints. It does not make the left and right slopes at the central event agree. A centered quotient alone is therefore insufficient to establish differentiability or zero instantaneous velocity. (d) Specify the convention at an idealized corner. The neighboring speeds have common limiting value 3 m/s, which could be assigned as an extension. However, under the question’s definition s = |v| where v exists, neither velocity nor its magnitude is defined at 2 s. Calling an assigned extension an existing |v(2 s)| would conceal the failed derivative. A smooth turnaround would require a different local position model; the exact V-shaped graph does not supply one.

Question 5

A symmetric quotient can hide an undefined velocity

A mathematical motion model is x(t)=(3m/s)|t−2s|,0≤t≤4s.x(t)=(3\ \mathrm{m/s})\,|t-2\ \mathrm{s}|,\qquad0\leq t\leq4\ \mathrm{s}. Use the two-sided derivative definition for velocity at an interior time. In this problem, instantaneous speed is defined as s(t)=|v(t)|s(t)=|v(t)| only where that velocity exists.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find velocity and speed for t<2st<2\ \mathrm{s} and t>2st>2\ \mathrm{s} within the stated interval.

  2. At 2 s, evaluate the quotient [x(2s+h)−x(2s)]/h[x(2\ \mathrm{s}+h)-x(2\ \mathrm{s})]/h for positive and negative hh. Does a single instantaneous velocity exist at the corner?

  3. For h>0h>0, compute the symmetric quotient [x(2s+h)−x(2s−h)]/(2h)[x(2\ \mathrm{s}+h)-x(2\ \mathrm{s}-h)]/(2h). Explain why its value does not establish zero velocity at 2 s.

  4. The speed just before and just after the corner tends to 3 m/s. Under the stated definition, is speed at the corner therefore automatically defined as 3 m/s? Distinguish a limiting or assigned value from a value furnished by |v(2s)||v(2\ \mathrm{s})|.

Question 5 - Solution

A symmetric quotient can hide an undefined velocity

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Differentiate each straight branch away from the corner.

v(t)={−3m/s,t<2s,+3m/s,t>2s,s(t)=3m/s(t≠2s).v(t)=\begin{cases}-3\ \mathrm{m/s},&t<2\ \mathrm{s},\\+3\ \mathrm{m/s},&t>2\ \mathrm{s},\end{cases}\qquad s(t)=3\ \mathrm{m/s}\quad(t\ne2\ \mathrm{s}).

For t<2st<2\ \mathrm{s}, position decreases by 3 m each second, so v=−3m/s\boxed{v=-3\ \mathrm{m/s}}. For t>2st>2\ \mathrm{s}, it increases at the same rate, so v=+3m/s\boxed{v=+3\ \mathrm{m/s}}. On both open branches s=3m/s\boxed{s=3\ \mathrm{m/s}}.

(b) The two one-sided quotients disagree.

limh→0−3|h|h=−3≠+3=limh→0+3|h|h(m/s).\lim_{h\to0^-}\frac{3|h|}{h}=-3\ne+3=\lim_{h\to0^+}\frac{3|h|}{h}\quad(\mathrm{m/s}).

At 2 s the position is zero. The quotient is (3m/s)|h|/h(3\ \mathrm{m/s})|h|/h, equal to +3m/s+3\ \mathrm{m/s} for positive hh and −3m/s-3\ \mathrm{m/s} for negative hh. The two-sided limit does not exist. Thus v(2s) is undefined in this model\boxed{v(2\ \mathrm{s})\text{ is undefined in this model}}.

(c) Symmetric cancellation is not the derivative test.

x(2+h)−x(2−h)2h=3h−3h2h=0(h>0).\frac{x(2+h)-x(2-h)}{2h}=\frac{3h-3h}{2h}=0\quad(h>0).

The two symmetric positions are equal, so the centered quotient is zero for every allowed h>0h>0. This describes zero average velocity between those paired endpoints. It does not make the left and right slopes at the central event agree. A centered quotient alone is therefore insufficient to establish differentiability or zero instantaneous velocity.

(d) Specify the convention at an idealized corner.

The neighboring speeds have common limiting value 3 m/s, which could be assigned as an extension. However, under the question’s definition s=|v|s=|v| where vv exists, neither velocity nor its magnitude is defined at 2 s. Calling an assigned extension an existing |v(2s)||v(2\ \mathrm{s})| would conceal the failed derivative. A smooth turnaround would require a different local position model; the exact V-shaped graph does not supply one.