Supersonic Speeds, Shock Waves — Question 7

Section 17-9 · Physics pages 2804–2805

Question 7 The cone marks the merger of two retarded emission times A source has moved for all relevant past times along (vte, h) with v > c. A stationary observer at the origin receives a signal at t = te + √ v2t2e + h2/c. Consider positive reception times and retain the physical condition t −te ≥0. S µ v Cross-section of the cone tangent to an earlier spherical wavefront; the source moves right. (a) Derive a quadratic equation for te and find the earliest positive reception time from its discriminant. (b) Explain the number of physical emission times just before, at, and after that threshold. Why is a divergent linear amplitude near the envelope not a complete shock theory?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 7 - Solution The cone marks the merger of two retarded emission times S µ v (a) Method and calculation Squaring c(t −te) = √ v2t2e + h2 and rearranging gives (v2 −c2)t2 e + 2c2tte + h2 −c2t2 = 0. Its discriminant is D = 4[c2v2t2 −(v2 −c2)h2]. For positive t, D ≥0 requires t ≥tb = h √ v2 −c2/(cv) = h √ M2 −1/v. (b) Interpretation and further calculation Before tb there is no real emission time. At tb the two roots merge into one tangent event. After it there are two real roots, both satisfying te < t for positive t; two different earlier emissions reach the same event. Concentration of wavefronts explains the envelope, but finite-amplitude nonlinear response, dissipation and source size determine an actual shock profile. Physical check Negative reception times admitted by the squared discriminant must still pass the unsquared propagation condition; the positive-time restriction prevents that spurious interpretation here.

Question 7

The cone marks the merger of two retarded emission times

A source has moved for all relevant past times along (vte,h)(vt_e,h) with v>cv>c. A stationary observer at the origin receives a signal at t=te+v2te2+h2/ct=t_e+\sqrt{v^2t_e^2+h^2}/c. Consider positive reception times and retain the physical condition t−te≥0t-t_e\ge0.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Derive a quadratic equation for tet_e and find the earliest positive reception time from its discriminant.

  2. Explain the number of physical emission times just before, at, and after that threshold. Why is a divergent linear amplitude near the envelope not a complete shock theory?

Question 7 - Solution

The cone marks the merger of two retarded emission times

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Method and calculation

Squaring c(t−te)=v2te2+h2c(t-t_e)=\sqrt{v^2t_e^2+h^2} and rearranging gives(v2−c2)te2+2c2tte+h2−c2t2=0.(v^2-c^2)t_e^2+2c^2tt_e+h^2-c^2t^2=0.Its discriminant isD=4[c2v2t2−(v2−c2)h2].D=4[c^2v^2t^2-(v^2-c^2)h^2].For positive tt, D≥0D\ge0 requires t≥tb=hv2−c2/(cv)=hM2−1/vt\ge t_b=h\sqrt{v^2-c^2}/(cv)=h\sqrt{M^2-1}/v.

(b) Interpretation and further calculation

Before tbt_b there is no real emission time. At tbt_b the two roots merge into one tangent event. After it there are two real roots, both satisfying te<tt_e<t for positive tt; two different earlier emissions reach the same event. Concentration of wavefronts explains the envelope, but finite-amplitude nonlinear response, dissipation and source size determine an actual shock profile.

Physical check

Negative reception times admitted by the squared discriminant must still pass the unsquared propagation condition; the positive-time restriction prevents that spurious interpretation here.