Damped Simple Harmonic Motion — Question 4

Section 15-7 · Physics pages 2358–2359

Question 4 Adjacent extrema and same-side peaks imply different decrements The absolute displacements at successive extrema of an underdamped viscous oscillator are 12.0, 9.0 and 6.75 mm. Adjacent extrema are .20 s apart. Their signs alternate. t x 12 −9 6.75 Alternating extrema labeled in mm; adjacent extrema are half a damped cycle apart. (a) Find Td, β and the logarithmic decrement between successive positive maxima. (b) Find the mechanical-energy ratio between adjacent extrema. Explain the factor-of-two mistake made by treating adjacent extrema as a full period.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 4 - Solution Adjacent extrema and same-side peaks imply different decrements t x 12 −9 6.75 (a) Derivation and calculation ∆t = Td/2 = .200 s ⇒Td = .400 s . e−β∆t = 9/12 = .750 ⇒β = ln(4/3) .200 = 1.43841 s−1 . δ = βTd = 2 ln(4/3) = .575364 . (b) Result and interpretation At an extremum, E = kx2/2: En+1 En = (|xn+1| |xn| )2 = .7502 = .5625 . ωd = 2π/.400 = 15.708 rad/s. Treating .200 s as a full period doubles the inferred frequency; using ln(4/3) as the same-side decrement halves its true value. Physical check The two-step ratio is 6.75/12 = .5625 = e−δ, confirming the same-side decrement.

Question 4

Adjacent extrema and same-side peaks imply different decrements

The absolute displacements at successive extrema of an underdamped viscous oscillator are 12.012.0, 9.09.0 and 6.75mm6.75\,\mathrm{mm}. Adjacent extrema are .20s.20\,\mathrm{s} apart. Their signs alternate.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find TdT_d, β\beta and the logarithmic decrement between successive positive maxima.

  2. Find the mechanical-energy ratio between adjacent extrema. Explain the factor-of-two mistake made by treating adjacent extrema as a full period.

Question 4 - Solution

Adjacent extrema and same-side peaks imply different decrements

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Derivation and calculation

Δt=Td/2=.200s⇒Td=.400s.\Delta t=T_d/2=.200\,\mathrm s\Rightarrow\boxed{T_d=.400\,\mathrm s}.e−βΔt=9/12=.750⇒β=ln⁡(4/3).200=1.43841s−1.e^{-\beta\Delta t}=9/12=.750\Rightarrow\boxed{\beta=\frac{\ln(4/3)}{.200}=1.43841\,\mathrm{s^{-1}}}.δ=βTd=2ln⁡(4/3)=.575364.\boxed{\delta=\beta T_d=2\ln(4/3)=.575364}.

(b) Result and interpretation

At an extremum, E=kx2/2E=kx^2/2:En+1En=(|xn+1||xn|)2=.7502=.5625.\boxed{\frac{E_{n+1}}{E_n}=\left(\frac{|x_{n+1}|}{|x_n|}\right)^2=.750^2=.5625}.ωd=2π/.400=15.708rad/s.\omega_d=2\pi/.400=15.708\,\mathrm{rad/s}.Treating .200s.200\,\mathrm s as a full period doubles the inferred frequency; using ln⁡(4/3)\ln(4/3) as the same-side decrement halves its true value.

Physical check

The two-step ratio is 6.75/12=.5625=e−δ6.75/12=.5625=e^{-\delta}, confirming the same-side decrement.