Pendulums — Question 9

Section 15-5 · Physics pages 2328–2329

Question 9 Finite amplitude makes an ideal pendulum clock run slow For a simple pendulum, use the supplied small-amplitude correction T(θA) ≈T0(1 + θ2 A/16), with angle in radians. A clock is calibrated using T0, but operates at amplitude θA = .20 rad. It counts each physical cycle as T0 of indicated time. θ ℓ Pendulum schematic; angle is measured from the downward vertical. (a) Estimate its indicated time after 3600 s of true elapsed time and the time lost. (b) If amplitude is reduced to .10 rad, how does the leading fractional period excess change? State the approximation limits.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 9 - Solution Finite amplitude makes an ideal pendulum clock run slow θ ℓ (a) Derivation and calculation Using the supplied approximation, T = T0(1 + ϵ), ϵ = θ2 A/16 = .202/16 = .00250. N = ttrue/T, tindicated = NT0 = ttrue 1 + ϵ. tindicated = 3600/1.00250 = 3591.0224 s. (b) Result and interpretation time lost = 3600 −3591.0224 = 8.9776 s . θA 7→θA/2 ⇒ϵ 7→ϵ/4 = .000625. new loss = 3600 .000625 1.000625 = 2.2486 s. The longer actual period makes a clock calibrated to T0 run slow. Physical check The leading estimate 3600ϵ = 9.00 s agrees with the more precise ratio to the stated approximation order.

Question 9

Finite amplitude makes an ideal pendulum clock run slow

For a simple pendulum, use the supplied small-amplitude correction T(θA)≈T0(1+θA2/16)T(\theta_A)\approx T_0(1+\theta_A^2/16), with angle in radians. A clock is calibrated using T0T_0, but operates at amplitude θA=.20rad\theta_A=.20\,\mathrm{rad}. It counts each physical cycle as T0T_0 of indicated time.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Estimate its indicated time after 3600s3600\,\mathrm{s} of true elapsed time and the time lost.

  2. If amplitude is reduced to .10rad.10\,\mathrm{rad}, how does the leading fractional period excess change? State the approximation limits.

Question 9 - Solution

Finite amplitude makes an ideal pendulum clock run slow

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Derivation and calculation

Using the supplied approximation,T=T0(1+ϵ),ϵ=θA2/16=.202/16=.00250.T=T_0(1+\epsilon),\qquad\epsilon=\theta_A^2/16=.20^2/16=.00250.N=ttrue/T,tindicated=NT0=ttrue1+ϵ.N=t_{\mathrm{true}}/T,\quad t_{\mathrm{indicated}}=NT_0=\frac{t_{\mathrm{true}}}{1+\epsilon}.tindicated=3600/1.00250=3591.0224s.t_{\mathrm{indicated}}=3600/1.00250=3591.0224\,\mathrm s.

(b) Result and interpretation

time lost=3600−3591.0224=8.9776s.\boxed{\text{time lost}=3600-3591.0224=8.9776\,\mathrm s}.θA↦θA/2⇒ϵ↦ϵ/4=.000625.\theta_A\mapsto\theta_A/2\Rightarrow\epsilon\mapsto\epsilon/4=.000625.new loss=3600.0006251.000625=2.2486s.\text{new loss}=3600\frac{.000625}{1.000625}=2.2486\,\mathrm s.The longer actual period makes a clock calibrated to T0T_0 run slow.

Physical check

The leading estimate 3600ϵ=9.00s3600\epsilon=9.00\,\mathrm s agrees with the more precise ratio to the stated approximation order.