Simple Harmonic Motion — Question 7

Section 15-1 · Physics pages 2244–2245

Question 7 Periodic does not necessarily mean simple harmonic A periodic signal is x(t) = A cos ωt + ϵA cos 2ωt, where A > 0, ω > 0 and ϵ = 0.10. The equilibrium reference is zero. ωt x/A Superposed fundamental and second harmonic; the profile is periodic but not sinusoidal. (a) Compute a + ω2x and decide whether this signal satisfies the SHM equation with frequency ω. (b) Could it instead be exactly SHM at some other single frequency? Use the two independent harmonics to justify the answer.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 7 - Solution Periodic does not necessarily mean simple harmonic ωt x/A (a) Derivation and calculation x = A cos ωt + ϵA cos 2ωt, a = −ω2A cos ωt −4ϵω2A cos 2ωt. a + ω2x = −3ϵω2A cos 2ωt = −0.30ω2A cos 2ωt̸ = 0 . The original SHM equation therefore fails, even though x(t + 2π/ω) = x(t). (b) Result and interpretation For an arbitrary candidate frequency Ω, a + Ω2x = A(Ω2 −ω2) cos ωt +ϵA(Ω2 −4ω2) cos 2ωt. Independent nonzero harmonics require both coefficients to vanish: Ω2 = ω2 and Ω2 = 4ω2, which is impossible for ω > 0. Physical check The limiting case ϵ = 0 removes the second constraint and restores exact SHM.

Question 7

Periodic does not necessarily mean simple harmonic

A periodic signal is x(t)=Acos⁡ωt+ϵAcos⁡2ωtx(t)=A\cos\omega t+\epsilon A\cos2\omega t, where A>0A>0, ω>0\omega>0 and ϵ=0.10\epsilon=0.10. The equilibrium reference is zero.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Compute a+ω2xa+\omega^2x and decide whether this signal satisfies the SHM equation with frequency ω\omega.

  2. Could it instead be exactly SHM at some other single frequency? Use the two independent harmonics to justify the answer.

Question 7 - Solution

Periodic does not necessarily mean simple harmonic

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Derivation and calculation

x=Acos⁡ωt+ϵAcos⁡2ωt,x=A\cos\omega t+\epsilon A\cos2\omega t,a=−ω2Acos⁡ωt−4ϵω2Acos⁡2ωt.a=-\omega^2A\cos\omega t-4\epsilon\omega^2A\cos2\omega t.a+ω2x=−3ϵω2Acos⁡2ωt=−0.30ω2Acos⁡2ωt≠0.\boxed{a+\omega^2x=-3\epsilon\omega^2A\cos2\omega t=-0.30\omega^2A\cos2\omega t\ne0}.The original SHM equation therefore fails, even though x(t+2π/ω)=x(t)x(t+2\pi/\omega)=x(t).

(b) Result and interpretation

For an arbitrary candidate frequency Ω\Omega,a+Ω2x=A(Ω2−ω2)cos⁡ωta+\Omega^2x=A(\Omega^2-\omega^2)\cos\omega t+ϵA(Ω2−4ω2)cos⁡2ωt.\hspace{2.0cm}+\epsilon A(\Omega^2-4\omega^2)\cos2\omega t.Independent nonzero harmonics require both coefficients to vanish:Ω2=ω2andΩ2=4ω2,\Omega^2=\omega^2\quad\text{and}\quad\Omega^2=4\omega^2,which is impossible for ω>0\omega>0.

Physical check

The limiting case ϵ=0\epsilon=0 removes the second constraint and restores exact SHM.