The Equation of Continuity — Question 7

Section 14-8 · Physics pages 2204–2205

Question 7 Storage must be accounted for before declaring a leak A rigid gas vessel of volume V = 0.50 m3 has measured inlet mass flow 0.080 kg/s and measured outlet mass flow 0.050 kg/s. During a 20 s interval its spatially uniform density rises from 1.0 to 1.8 kg/m3. Assume these rates are constant and an unmeasured leak, if present, is outward. in out leak The vessel stores mass while inlet, measured outlet, and possible leak carry different mass flows. (a) Find the mass accumulation and the average leak mass flow required by the data. (b) What density would be predicted at the end if there were no leak? Why is the inlet-minus-outlet difference alone not the leak rate?
Show solutionHide solution
Question 7 - Solution Storage must be accounted for before declaring a leak in out leak (a) Derivation and calculation ∆M = V (ρf −ρi) = .500(1.80 −1.00) = .400 kg . ∆M ∆t = .400/20 = .0200 kg/s. ˙min −˙mout −˙mleak = dM/dt. ˙mleak = .080 −.050 −.020 = .0100 kg/s . (b) Result and interpretation With no leak, ∆M0 = (.080 −.050)(20) = .600 kg. ρf,0 = ρi + ∆M0/V = 1.00 + .600/.500 = 2.20 kg/m3 . The measured port difference supplies accumulation as well as any leak; it is not itself the leak rate. Physical check The measured final density is lower than the no-leak prediction, consistent with positive outward leakage.

Question 7

Storage must be accounted for before declaring a leak

A rigid gas vessel of volume V=0.50m3V=0.50\,\mathrm{m^3} has measured inlet mass flow 0.080kg/s0.080\,\mathrm{kg/s} and measured outlet mass flow 0.050kg/s0.050\,\mathrm{kg/s}. During a 20s20\,\mathrm{s} interval its spatially uniform density rises from 1.01.0 to 1.8kg/m31.8\,\mathrm{kg/m^3}. Assume these rates are constant and an unmeasured leak, if present, is outward.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the mass accumulation and the average leak mass flow required by the data.

  2. What density would be predicted at the end if there were no leak? Why is the inlet-minus-outlet difference alone not the leak rate?

Question 7 - Solution

Storage must be accounted for before declaring a leak

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Derivation and calculation

ΔM=V(ρf−ρi)=.500(1.80−1.00)=.400kg.\boxed{\Delta M=V(\rho_f-\rho_i)=.500(1.80-1.00)=.400\,\mathrm{kg}}.ΔMΔt=.400/20=.0200kg/s.\frac{\Delta M}{\Delta t}=.400/20=.0200\,\mathrm{kg/s}.ṁin−ṁout−ṁleak=dM/dt.\dot m_{\mathrm{in}}-\dot m_{\mathrm{out}}-\dot m_{\mathrm{leak}}=dM/dt.ṁ¯leak=.080−.050−.020=.0100kg/s.\boxed{\overline{\dot m}_{\mathrm{leak}}=.080-.050-.020=.0100\,\mathrm{kg/s}}.

(b) Result and interpretation

With no leak,ΔM0=(.080−.050)(20)=.600kg.\Delta M_0=(.080-.050)(20)=.600\,\mathrm{kg}.ρf,0=ρi+ΔM0/V=1.00+.600/.500=2.20kg/m3.\boxed{\rho_{f,0}=\rho_i+\Delta M_0/V=1.00+.600/.500=2.20\,\mathrm{kg/m^3}}.The measured port difference supplies accumulation as well as any leak; it is not itself the leak rate.

Physical check

The measured final density is lower than the no-leak prediction, consistent with positive outward leakage.