Fluids at Rest — Question 9

Section 14-3 · Physics pages 2108–2109

Question 9 A compressible atmosphere is not a constant-density column An idealized static atmosphere satisfies the supplied relation ρ = p/c2 with constant c, and constant downward gravity g. At altitude z = 0, pressure is p0; z increases upward. z p Hs Exponential atmospheric pressure and the ground-density linear approximation (dashed). (a) Derive p(z) and the altitude where it is half of p0. (b) Use c2 = 8.0 × 104 m2/s2 and g = 10 m/s2. At one scale height, compare the exact pressure with the constant-density approximation based on ground density.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 9 - Solution A compressible atmosphere is not a constant-density column z p Hs (a) Derivation and calculation dp dz = −ρg = −g c2 p ⇒ ∫p(z) p0 dp p = −g c2 ∫z 0 dz. p(z) = p0e−z/Hs , Hs = c2/g . p = p0/2 ⇒z1/2 = Hs ln 2 . (b) Result and interpretation Hs = 8.0 × 104/10 = 8000 m, z1/2 = 5545.18 m . p(Hs) = p0/e = .367879p0 . plinear(Hs) = p0 −ρ0gHs = p0 −p0 c2 gc2 g = 0. The linear approximation fails over a scale height because density changes substantially. Physical check For z/Hs ≪1, expansion of the exponential reproduces p0 −ρ0gz.

Question 9

A compressible atmosphere is not a constant-density column

An idealized static atmosphere satisfies the supplied relation ρ=p/c2\rho=p/c^2 with constant cc, and constant downward gravity gg. At altitude z=0z=0, pressure is p0p_0; zz increases upward.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Derive p(z)p(z) and the altitude where it is half of p0p_0.

  2. Use c2=8.0×104m2/s2c^2=8.0\times10^4\,\mathrm{m^2/s^2} and g=10m/s2g=10\,\mathrm{m/s^2}. At one scale height, compare the exact pressure with the constant-density approximation based on ground density.

Question 9 - Solution

A compressible atmosphere is not a constant-density column

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Derivation and calculation

dpdz=−ρg=−gc2p⇒∫p0p(z)dpp=−gc2∫0zdz.\frac{dp}{dz}=-\rho g=-\frac{g}{c^2}p\Rightarrow\int_{p_0}^{p(z)}\frac{dp}{p}=-\frac g{c^2}\int_0^z dz.p(z)=p0e−z/Hs,Hs=c2/g.\boxed{p(z)=p_0e^{-z/H_s}},\qquad\boxed{H_s=c^2/g}.p=p0/2⇒z1/2=Hsln⁡2.p=p_0/2\Rightarrow\boxed{z_{1/2}=H_s\ln2}.

(b) Result and interpretation

Hs=8.0×104/10=8000m,z1/2=5545.18m.H_s=8.0\times10^4/10=8000\,\mathrm m,\quad\boxed{z_{1/2}=5545.18\,\mathrm m}.p(Hs)=p0/e=.367879p0.p(H_s)=\boxed{p_0/e=.367879p_0}.plinear(Hs)=p0−ρ0gHs=p0−p0c2gc2g=0.p_{\mathrm{linear}}(H_s)=p_0-\rho_0gH_s=p_0-\frac{p_0}{c^2}g\frac{c^2}{g}=0.The linear approximation fails over a scale height because density changes substantially.

Physical check

For z/Hs≪1z/H_s\ll1, expansion of the exponential reproduces p0−ρ0gzp_0-\rho_0gz.