Einstein and Gravitation — Question 1

Section 13-8 · Physics pages 2032–2033

Question 1 A freely falling accelerometer does not measure the Newtonian gravity magnitude In a small laboratory near a spherical planet, an ideal spring accelerometer measures non-gravitational force per unit mass. Compare a supported laboratory with one in free fall. Work in the weak-field limit and neglect tidal differences across the apparatus. supported free fall g The readings compare proper support acceleration, not coordinate acceleration. (a) Find accelerometer readings in the two laboratories when local Newtonian gravity is g. (b) Explain which laboratory approximates a local inertial frame and why a zero reading does not establish that spacetime is flat.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 1 - Solution A freely falling accelerometer does not measure the Newtonian gravity magnitude supported free fall g (a) Derivation and calculation Take upward as positive. A supported laboratory satisfies N −mg = 0, ameter = N/m, so ameter,supported = g . In free fall, N = 0, ¨z = −g, ameter,free = 0 . The accelerometer measures non-gravitational force per unit mass, not the downward coordinate acceleration. (b) Result and interpretation For an approximately uniform field, use a falling origin zf with ¨zf = −g. A free particle has ¨z′ = ¨z −¨zf = (−g) −(−g) = 0. This gives a local inertial description. For separated free particles, however, δ¨⃗r ≃(δ⃗r · ∇)⃗g can remain nonzero: one zero accelerometer reading does not establish flat spacetime. Physical check The local approximation removes a common acceleration, while finite tidal differences can remain measurable.

Question 1

A freely falling accelerometer does not measure the Newtonian gravity magnitude

In a small laboratory near a spherical planet, an ideal spring accelerometer measures non-gravitational force per unit mass. Compare a supported laboratory with one in free fall. Work in the weak-field limit and neglect tidal differences across the apparatus.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find accelerometer readings in the two laboratories when local Newtonian gravity is gg.

  2. Explain which laboratory approximates a local inertial frame and why a zero reading does not establish that spacetime is flat.

Question 1 - Solution

A freely falling accelerometer does not measure the Newtonian gravity magnitude

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Derivation and calculation

Take upward as positive. A supported laboratory satisfies N−mg=0,ameter=N/m,N-mg=0,\qquad a_{\mathrm{meter}}=N/m, so ameter,supported=g.\boxed{a_{\mathrm{meter,supported}}=g}. In free fall, N=0,z̈=−g,ameter,free=0.N=0,\quad\ddot z=-g,\qquad\boxed{a_{\mathrm{meter,free}}=0}. The accelerometer measures non-gravitational force per unit mass, not the downward coordinate acceleration.

(b) Result and interpretation

For an approximately uniform field, use a falling origin zfz_f with z̈f=−g\ddot z_f=-g. A free particle has z̈′=z̈−z̈f=(−g)−(−g)=0.\ddot z'=\ddot z-\ddot z_f=(-g)-(-g)=0. This gives a local inertial description. For separated free particles, however, δr→̈≃(δr→⋅𝜵)g→\delta\ddot{\vec r}\simeq(\delta\vec r\cdot\boldsymbol\nabla)\vec g can remain nonzero: one zero accelerometer reading does not establish flat spacetime.

Physical check

The local approximation removes a common acceleration, while finite tidal differences can remain measurable.