Conservation of Angular Momentum — Question 3

Section 11-10 · Physics pages 1736–1737

Question 3 Vertical deposition brings mass but no axial angular momentum A horizontal disk has I = 1.0 kg m2 and ω = 4 rad/s. A 1.0 kg lump falls vertically and sticks at radius 0.50 m. The axle supplies negligible vertical-axis torque. vertical fall m R A falling lump adds axial inertia but brings no angular momentum along the vertical axis. (a) Find the final angular speed. (b) Find the loss of azimuthal rotational energy; explain why this is not the total three-dimensional impact loss.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 3 - Solution Vertical deposition brings mass but no axial angular momentum vertical fall m R (a) Derivation and calculation Incoming momentum is vertical, so (⃗r ×⃗pincoming)z = 0. Axial angular momentum conservation gives Iiωi = (Ii + mR2)ωf, ωf = 1(4) 1 + 1(.50)2 = 3.20 rad/s . (b) Result and interpretation The azimuthal rotational energies are Krot,i = 1 2(1)(4)2 = 8.00 J, Krot,f = 1 2(1.25)(3.20)2 = 6.40 J. Thus ∆Krot,loss = 1.60 J . Stopping the downward motion involves additional energy that depends on the unspecified vertical impact speed; this is not the full three-dimensional impact-loss calculation. Physical check The final axial momentum is 1.25(3.2) = 4, matching the initial disk momentum.

Question 3

Vertical deposition brings mass but no axial angular momentum

A horizontal disk has I=1.0kgm2I=1.0\,\mathrm{kg\,m^2} and ω=4rad/s\omega=4\,\mathrm{rad/s}. A 1.0kg1.0\,\mathrm{kg} lump falls vertically and sticks at radius 0.50m0.50\,\mathrm m. The axle supplies negligible vertical-axis torque.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find the final angular speed.

  2. Find the loss of azimuthal rotational energy; explain why this is not the total three-dimensional impact loss.

Question 3 - Solution

Vertical deposition brings mass but no axial angular momentum

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Derivation and calculation

Incoming momentum is vertical, so (r→×p→incoming)z=0.(\vec r\times\vec p_{\mathrm{incoming}})_z=0. Axial angular momentum conservation gives Iiωi=(Ii+mR2)ωf,I_i\omega_i=(I_i+mR^2)\omega_f, ωf=1(4)1+1(.50)2=3.20rad/s.\boxed{\omega_f=\frac{1(4)}{1+1(.50)^2}=3.20\ \mathrm{rad/s}}.

(b) Result and interpretation

The azimuthal rotational energies are Krot,i=12(1)(4)2=8.00J,K_{{\mathrm{rot}},i}=\tfrac12(1)(4)^2=8.00\ \mathrm J, Krot,f=12(1.25)(3.20)2=6.40J.K_{{\mathrm{rot}},f}=\tfrac12(1.25)(3.20)^2=6.40\ \mathrm J. Thus ΔKrot,loss=1.60J\boxed{\Delta K_{\mathrm{rot,loss}}=1.60\ \mathrm J}. Stopping the downward motion involves additional energy that depends on the unspecified vertical impact speed; this is not the full three-dimensional impact-loss calculation.

Physical check

The final axial momentum is 1.25(3.2)=41.25(3.2)=4, matching the initial disk momentum.