Work and Rotational Kinetic Energy — Question 3

Section 10-9 · Physics pages 1536–1537

Question 3 Motor input splits between kinetic energy and bearing heating A rotor with I = 0.40 kg m2 starts at 2 rad/s. A motor applies 4.0 N m while a constant bearing torque of magnitude 1.5 N m opposes its positive motion through 8 rad. motor rotor τm∆θ bearing heat ∆K Motor work is divided between increased rotational energy and dissipation in the bearing. (a) Find motor work, bearing dissipation and final angular speed. (b) Check the result using angular acceleration and the kinematic speed-angle relation.
Show solutionHide solution
Question 3 - Solution Motor input splits between kinetic energy and bearing heating motor rotor τm∆θ bearing heat ∆K (a) Derivation and calculation Keep supplied work and dissipated energy distinct: Wm = 4.0(8) = 32 J , Qb = 1.5(8) = 12 J , Wb = −12 J. Kf = 1 2(0.40)(2)2 + 32 −12 = 20.8 J. ωf = √ 2Kf I = √ 104 = 10.198 rad/s . (b) Result and interpretation The independent constant-acceleration calculation gives α = 4.0 −1.5 0.40 = 6.25 rad/s2. ω2 f = ω2 i + 2α∆θ = 4 + 2(6.25)(8) = 104. Both methods use the same net torque and produce the same speed. Physical check The 32 J motor input exceeds the 20 J increase in kinetic energy by the 12 J dissipated.

Question 3

Motor input splits between kinetic energy and bearing heating

A rotor with I=0.40kgm2I=0.40\,\mathrm{kg\,m^2} starts at 2rad/s2\,\mathrm{rad/s}. A motor applies 4.0Nm4.0\,\mathrm{N\,m} while a constant bearing torque of magnitude 1.5Nm1.5\,\mathrm{N\,m} opposes its positive motion through 8rad8\,\mathrm{rad}.

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

  1. Find motor work, bearing dissipation and final angular speed.

  2. Check the result using angular acceleration and the kinematic speed-angle relation.

Question 3 - Solution

Motor input splits between kinetic energy and bearing heating

Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.

(a) Derivation and calculation

Keep supplied work and dissipated energy distinct: Wm=4.0(8)=32J,Qb=1.5(8)=12J,Wb=−12J.\boxed{W_m=4.0(8)=32\ \mathrm J},\qquad \boxed{Q_b=1.5(8)=12\ \mathrm J},\qquad W_b=-12\ \mathrm J. Kf=12(0.40)(2)2+32−12=20.8J.K_f=\tfrac12(0.40)(2)^2+32-12=20.8\ \mathrm J. ωf=2KfI=104=10.198rad/s.\boxed{\omega_f=\sqrt{\frac{2K_f}{I}}=\sqrt{104}=10.198\ \mathrm{rad/s}}.

(b) Result and interpretation

The independent constant-acceleration calculation gives α=4.0−1.50.40=6.25rad/s2.\alpha=\frac{4.0-1.5}{0.40}=6.25\ \mathrm{rad/s^2}. ωf2=ωi2+2αΔθ=4+2(6.25)(8)=104.\omega_f^2=\omega_i^2+2\alpha\Delta\theta=4+2(6.25)(8)=104. Both methods use the same net torque and produce the same speed.

Physical check

The 32 J motor input exceeds the 20 J increase in kinetic energy by the 12 J dissipated.