Show solutionHide solution
Question 6
Changing a temperature is not the same as converting a change
Let and denote the numerical readings on the Celsius and Fahrenheit scales for the same temperature, and let be its thermodynamic temperature’s numerical value in kelvins. Use the exact relations
Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.
A sample warms from to . Treat these readings as exact for this exercise.
Convert both endpoint readings to Fahrenheit and kelvins. Then express the temperature rise in Celsius degrees, Fahrenheit degrees, and kelvins.
A student substitutes the Celsius rise into and reports a rise of . Diagnose the error by subtracting the two endpoint equations symbolically.
Another student says is twice the thermodynamic temperature of . Assess this using kelvins. Explain why an offset scale cannot support that ratio argument.
Question 6 - Solution
Changing a temperature is not the same as converting a change
Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.
(a) Convert readings first, then subtract.
The rise is as temperature intervals. These equalities do not identify the corresponding scale readings.
(b) The offsets cancel in a difference.
So the rise is Fahrenheit degrees. Adding 32 incorrectly treats a temperature difference as a Celsius reading. Similarly , since 273.15 cancels.
(c) A numerical ratio depends on the origin.
The two thermodynamic temperatures are and . Their ratio is not 2. Doubling the Celsius numerical reading doubles its difference from the Celsius zero, not the thermodynamic temperature. A common multiplicative unit change preserves ratios; an additive shift of origin generally does not.