Show solutionHide solution
Question 6
Measure many to infer one
Identical rigid sheets are stacked without gaps or compression. A height instrument adds the same unknown offset to every stack reading. Its model is where is one sheet’s thickness and is an exact count. Each displayed height also has a worst-case reading-error bound of mm. The measured pairs are , , and .
Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.
Use the 20-sheet and 80-sheet central readings to determine and . Does the 50-sheet central reading support the model?
Bound using the two endpoint readings. Do not divide the offset by the number of sheets or assume random-error cancellation.
Evaluate the shortcut . Explain its error here and one physical condition whose failure would invalidate the stacking model even after the offset is removed.
Question 6 - Solution
Measure many to infer one
Diagram shown in the original SVG worksheet.
(a) Differences isolate the thickness.
Subtracting from removes : The predicted middle reading is mm, matching the data. This is a consistency check, not proof that the model holds for every stack.
(b) Propagate worst-case bounds.
The difference lies in mm because its two reading bounds can oppose each other. Dividing by the exact count difference, 60, This is a bounded-error interval, not a statistical standard deviation. The third reading is compatible with both extreme slopes; it does not tighten this endpoint-derived interval here.
(c) Diagnose the shortcut.
mm is too large by mm because it includes . Using more sheets reduces this offset contribution but does not justify ignoring it. Gaps, unequal sheet thicknesses, or compression that depends on stack size could violate ; these require separate physical controls.